Re: 10.1.0.4 patchset 2 catcpu.sql slop
That's not the point, Oracle states in Metalink note 3663846.8
proclaiming that it is fixed in 10.1.0.4
and is isn't. This works in
9ir2 but broke sometime in 10g. Can you spell regression?
On 6/29/05, Mladen Gogala <email@example.com> wrote:
> One thing we found on 10.1.0.4 <http://10.1.0.4> is large pl/sql
> blocks don't compile. They fail with pls-123 Program too large error.
> I am currently working on creating a test case for Support, since the
> bug was closed as fixed in 10.1.0.4 <http://10.1.0.4>. Ha !!
One way of fixing this would be to make a recommendation not to use
large PL/SQL blocks.
That wouldn't be the first time that the problem is solved on the
select standard_disclaimer from company_requirements where category = 'MANDATORY';